Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99
The business was disrupted. Diners we not attacked. It is a measured , disruptive tactic to focus the minds
of influential business owners , imposing costs on them.
You favor shooting the protestors, I take it?
|
In my state, KY, if I were sitting at a restaurant and an unruly crowd came in and did what they did, I would be within my rights to pull my Glock 17 and shoot to kill those acting out at my table.
I'm not saying I would, but I'd be within my rights. This has already been tested in the courts here. But I'm torn. Most of these people are simply kids that will grow out of this nonsense. Then again, so are enemy troops in an actual war. But the bottom line is that nobody should take pleasure in taking the life of another human being. However, sometimes it is prudent to do so, from many different perspectives. It's why Proverbs says there is a time for war and a time for peace.
So no, I'm not in favor of shooting these people, but if one of those people in that restaurant had shot and killed one of them, they would have been, in my state, within their rights to do do. And let us be honest. If more people did that, these terrorists would not be doing what the are doing.
And what they are doing is terrorism, based on their own narcissistic pet peeves.