Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99
I think the rules need to be relaxed a bit on the remote diagnosis thing, when the person with the raging personality disorder is RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.
It's not hyperbole when it's literally true.
|
Wouldn't the fact that the individual is running for prez make the production of proof more essential? Or would you prefer that the Dan Rather standard of proof be applied in all cases? Or does this lower standard only apply when we're taking about the Republican candidate?
If not, then show me evidence of this "literal" truth.