Darren Wilson's Side of the Story

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by finnbow

To me, the video of the Staten Island case makes any comment of mine superfluous. It stands on its own merit. I said absolutely nothing in support of the cops there. Not once.

Congratulations Finn!

You get the Edmund Burke award!

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

Or for dumb asses to buy into a silly meme without a shred of evidence to build their movement or support a cause.

It brings to mind Dubya's WMD claims.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Or for dumb asses to buy into a silly meme without a shred of evidence to build their movement or support a cause.

It brings to mind Dubya's WMD claims.

Hey, careful. I totally bought into the uranium yellow cake.
Come to think of it, you want us all to believe Wilson like the nation believed Dubya. Wierd logic if you ask me.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by BeamOn

Hey, careful. I totally bought into the uranium yellow cake.

You're being sarcastic I hope.

[sheltiedave]

Hey, let us take a second look at the narrative that Wilson did not shoot at Brown as he was fleeing.

The first evidence that Brown was shot at from behind is the bullet fired by Wilson that missed everything and lodged, without deformation, into a second story apartment wall by a entry into the apartment on the RIGHT, well along the pathway that Brown tried to flee.

The second contentious evidence is the bullet that struck Brown in the right arm and fractured his ulna as he fled.

SHOT COULD HAVE COME FROM BACK

During his announcement of the grand jury finding of no true bill, McCulloch sharply criticized the inconsistent eyewitness accounts. He called out one particular claim that Brown was shot in the back as he was running away.

“However once the autopsy findings were released showing that Michael Brown had not sustained any wound to the back of his body, no additional witnesses made such a claim.” JUST DORIAN JOHNSON, THE WITNESS CLOSEST TO THE DEADLY SCENE.

But there was no evidence that Wilson did not fire at Brown’s back and miss. And, in fact, one expert testified one of the wounds could have come while Brown was running away.

The forensic pathologist for the federal government, a doctor based at Dover Air Force Base, testified that one gunshot on Brown’s body could have come from behind. It was the shot to his right forearm that fractured the ulna, one of the long bones in the forearm.

“So if you are asking me could a shot from his backside produce that, I say yes,” the pathologist said. “Because as you are running, if your arm is down like this, that surface, that very surface of your arm is exposed posteriorly. So a bullet coming from behind you could cause that injury.”

Asked if it could have come from the front side, the pathologist said, “Yes, depending on how your arm is.”

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

You're being sarcastic I hope.

Yes and Finn's analogy was dumbfounding.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by BeamOn

Yes and Finn's analogy was dumbfounding.

I aim to please.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by finnbow

I aim to please.

Yes, you are seldom correct but quite a diversion.
Disclaimer: TJ may not think so.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by BeamOn

Yes and Finn's analogy was dumbfounding.

Thanks, I was worried about that.

I expect baggers like Whelly and Zero to have fallen for that yellow cake scam, but not you.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

Thanks, I was worried about that.

I expect baggers like Whelly and Zero to have fallen for that yellow cake scam, but not you.

Who can forget (or forgive) what the "patriots" did to Valerie Plame.