|
|
|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|

11-29-2014, 05:38 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,164
|
|
|
So is holding a grand jury investigation, in case you didn't notice.
At least one is in public, and therefore balanced.
You live in Maryland now, right?
|

11-29-2014, 06:43 PM
|
 |
Reformed Know-Nothing
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheltiedave
So is holding a grand jury investigation, in case you didn't notice.
At least one is in public, and therefore balanced.
You live in Maryland now, right?
|
Convening a grand jury is neither an abuse of power nor prosecutorial misconduct. And you, sir, are an idiot.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
|

11-29-2014, 06:49 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,164
|
|
|
Come on Finnbow, stay on topic. We already know I'm an idiot, so that is immaterial to this case. How many of Brown's fingerprints were found on Wilson's gun? It is a simple question, and you agree that all the evidence supports Wilson's testimony.
Were Brown's fingerprints on Wilson's gun?
You see, one of the DA assistants from Illinois suggested I ask this question. It is a tricky one.
|

11-29-2014, 06:53 PM
|
 |
Reformed Know-Nothing
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
|
|
|
Believe whatever you want, Sheltie. I'm tired of wasting my time with a mental midget.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
|

11-29-2014, 06:57 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,164
|
|
|
Oh, my feelings are hurt.
But you are not willing to answer a most specific and pertinent question, and actually one that this case revolves on. How many of Brown's fingerprints were on Wilson's gun?
Would anyone else hazard to help Finnbow out, since he chooses not to answer from lack of knowledge about the case evidence?
|

11-29-2014, 07:05 PM
|
 |
Reformed Know-Nothing
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheltiedave
Oh, my feelings are hurt.
But you are not willing to answer a most specific and pertinent question, and actually one that this case revolves on. How many of Brown's fingerprints were on Wilson's gun?
Would anyone else hazard to help Finnbow out, since he chooses not to answer from lack of knowledge about the case evidence?
|
The presence of Brown's fingerprints on the gun would prove Wilson's point. The absence, however, proves nothing (Brown could have lunged for the gun without leaving any latent prints on it). You can't prove a negative, numb nuts. As was summarized by the law professor in post #690's link, all available physical evidence supports Wilson's story and no physical evidence supports an alternate story. There is simply no credible physical evidence to support a prosecution of Wilson beyond a reasonable doubt.
Give up, you're pissing in the wind. Yes, blacks have been shit upon for centuries in this country and it continues, to a degree, in certain areas. That has no bearing on Wilson's guilt or innocence, however.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Last edited by finnbow; 11-29-2014 at 07:18 PM.
|

11-29-2014, 07:30 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,164
|
|
Then you obviously have not read Wilson's testimony, where he went into great detail about how Brown had total control over his Sig, controlling its elevation and forcing it down into his leg/hip, and trying to wrest it from him. Brown also fouled
You might want to start reading on page 245, about line 21, or a wee bit earlier.
Here ya go.. http://www.documentcloud.org/documen...testimony.html
Don't blame me, I'm only the messenger.  There are a number of lawyers who disagree with your stance, and there are very valid reasons the United States legal system is established as an adversarial process, with multiple courts, pleas, reviews, and jurisdictions. This grand jury did not have the adversarial process component that is a critical element of the initial process.
The asst. DA, unlike me, is quite smart and has multiple advanced degrees. She suggested you temper your more robust comments as she would chew you up in court for dessert after she finished with the St. Louis DA office for the main course. Then she would burp.
This is far from a done deal.
And by the way, what are the results on the fingerprint analysis?
|

11-29-2014, 08:59 PM
|
 |
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,929
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
Convening a grand jury is neither an abuse of power nor prosecutorial misconduct. And you, sir, are an idiot.
|
WTF. I expect this sort of thing from DJ....
|

11-29-2014, 09:04 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Open Border
Posts: 5,126
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99
WTF. I expect this sort of thing from DJ....
|
Thanks for the complement. I'm sure F-Bow won't appreciate this, but I couldn't agree more with him on this subject. You're just embarrassed @ this point.
|

11-29-2014, 09:07 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,164
|
|
|
So DJ, maybe you can tell us how the fingerprint analysis is going...
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.
|