Zimmerman Walks

[whell]

Originally Posted by noonereal

This is an incorrect statement,

Watch your own video.

If Martin was on top, which I suspect he was, it changes nothing. Do you think if Trayvon had lived he would not have testified that he was in fear and stood his ground? Zim killed that testimony.


The kid went out for candy while being black and paid the price.

What's incorrect about it, noone?

Trayvon might have had difficulty with that line of testimony. it would not have been consistent with the evidence presented.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Zeke

And we have a reasonable idea of what caused this:

1. Zimmerman stalking a kid.
2. The kid being terrified.

1. Zimmerman was not stalking as defined by FL law. http://www.womenslaw.org/statutes_de...34#statute-top

2. Do you have specific insight into "the kid's" state of mind that was not introduced into evidence at the trial?

Originally Posted by Zeke

Of course, the kid can't tell us that because a (typical) gun toting pussy murdered him.

You'll never be accused of being objective in this case, Zeke.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

1. Zimmerman was not stalking as defined by FL law. http://www.womenslaw.org/statutes_de...34#statute-top

2. Do you have specific insight into "the kid's" state of mind that was not introduced into evidence at the trial?



You'll never be accused of being objective in this case, Zeke.

The very same applies to you, Mike. In spades.

[whell]

Originally Posted by noonereal

Are you one of those "types" who thinks that Hispanic and black are the same thing?

Anyone who has ever lived in an inner city knows damned well that this is not the case.

"Types" noone? Everyone in your world has to correspond to a definition of some "type"?

Originally Posted by noonereal

In fact, in my experience which spans decades, I have found Hispanics the most anti black demographic out there.

And here I thought that "crackers" were white. Damn, I learn something new every day.

[whell]

Originally Posted by bobabode

The very same applies to you, Mike. In spades.

That's what you'd like to believe. And you'd be wrong, as usual.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

That's what you'd like to believe. And you'd be wrong, as usual.

Well, prove it, whell.

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by whell

"Types" noone? Everyone in your world has to correspond to a definition of some "type"?



And here I thought that "crackers" were white. Damn, I learn something new every day.

Sadly, it appears you do not learn.

[Zeke]

Originally Posted by whell

You'll never be accused of being objective in this case, Zeke.

No.

I'm merely right.

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by whell

What's incorrect about it, noone?

.

You claimed this witness said, " saw Martin on top of Zimmerman raining down blows" when in fact he said it "appeared" like Martin was on top... as in it was dark and I can't say definitively.

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by whell

Trayvon might have had difficulty with that line of testimony. it would not have been consistent with the evidence presented.

How on earth would it not have been consistent with the evidence presented??????????????????

Trayvon could have agreed with EVERYTHING Zim said and still been constant in saying he felt threatened and decided to stand his ground.

We had credible swore testimony that Travon was very concerned about a strange man following him. Who would not be. You of all people Whell.

Imagine his fright when he saw that the strange man that was following him had a gun?