Wow, the Wall Street banksters strike back

[wgrr]

[QUOTE=Krazygrrl;79010]Quite frankly, you are... about the typing. The only "reliable" source here is the NY Times. There is not one mention, of any bribes, of any kind, that any Supreme Court justice are even accused to have taken. In fact, there is not even the most minor assertion of graft made.

Huffingtonpost.com, Atlanticwire.com, alternet.orq...

You are quite right... you may have to "buy a book", or visit a library.... how sad, but it would be so good for you.[/QUOTE}

If bribes were a proven fact they would be be gone, maybe.

It is highly improper for any judges, in any court, to accept any money, or even attend a function that is sponsored by anyone they may have to hear a case that involves the anyone. They can attend and Maaaaabyee accept money from the anyone. The second it is clear their ruling may affect anyone, they have to recuse themselves. Koch was directly affected by the Citizens United decision. Alito and Thomas should have withdrawn from hearing the Citizens United case. They did not.

I read a lot. I have spent thousands of hours in libraries over the years. Oh, I am a Nazi. Right now I am reading a 1949 publishing of Hitler's "Mein Kampf" Some of the footnotes are hundreds of pages long. Fascinating stuff.

When do I get that definition of "social government".