Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 06-04-2011, 02:08 PM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657 View Post
There is no way that would satisfy the standard for sexual harassment. There might have been claims brought on less "egregious" photos, it is unlikely that they succeeded. A single inadvertent exposure would never get the attention of the EEOC or of any plaintiffs' lawyer who halfway knew his stuff. To establish a sexually hostile atmosphere, one must show that sexual conduct or innuendo is severe and pervasive


Besides the sexually hostile atmosphere, a plaintiff can make a sexual harassment claim by showing an actual or implied connection between keeping a job and sexual favors. There is not even the slightest hint of that in this instance.

What you have described is an incident that an employer should address, but not nearly enough to maintain a claim.

Regards,

D-Ray
I disagree. The EEOC and DOL are becoming far more aggressive in their support of, and pursuit of, claims. The atmosphere has changed significantly in the last year or so.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.