FAKE NEWS EXPOSED: A Service of PoliticalChat.com

[whell]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

You are the expert in all the above. You do it constantly. You did it when you posted the above.

Here, by item:

1. Insulted the posters and others by calling them hilarious.

2. You ignore that, despite long investigation by a Trump-appointed special prosecutor, Joe Biden has been indicted for nothing, and Hunter Biden has been indicted only for things totally unrelated to alleged influence peddling. Your facts in your long post that quoted Archer testimony transcripts do not even allege any wrongdoing by President Biden. A theory from a witness that some third party might feel intimidated is a million miles even from evidence that they were, much less that the President intended such result and took illegal action to produce it.

3. You mischaracterize the posts by insinuating that they wrongly disregard good arguments from you. Except the good arguments were never made (see point 2).

4. You have changed the topic, from allegations of wrongdoing by President Biden, to allegations of bad posting practices by others here.

Oh bullshit.

1. There is no question that NO ONE has yet to respond to the substance of the post above.

2. Investigations into Biden's handling of documents is still ongoing, though I would be surprised if it goes anywhere. There is whistleblower testimony that calls into question whether or not the DOJ is politicized. If true, Biden may have nothing to worry about.

The posts from the testimony were selected to address comments by Finn, where he relied on a WaPo article by Bump. If you'd read my post in context, you'd know this. Instead, you relied on tactic 3 listed above, since that post was not intended to be an effort to "allege wrong-doing by Biden". It was more of a commentary and counterpoint about Bump's factually challenged reporting, which Finn apparently holds in high regard.

3. As noted in #2 above, you're mischaracterizing my post, so I'm not worried about your critique of the arguments I was making.

4. How is pointing out that no one has responded substantively to my post "changing the subject"? Answer - it isn't It's an observation, but also a challenge to respond in a more engaging manner. A challenge that you apparently have decided to pass on.