Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99
I agree very much with this observation. In this regard, I thought the thing departed blatantly from credibility when he described, supposedly in the middle of the fight in the car, a decision-making process in which he goes-through and considers each each non-lethal weapon available to him, elaborating reasons to reject each one, before deciding to draw his gun.
|
Jesus Christ. Some of you are so out of your fucking element.
An officer does the above while chewing gum, every moment of every day.
A fighter pilot doesn't eject because his training, experience and situational awareness (doesn't even have to look at the instruments) tell him he's "too low, too fast, over a populated area and etc.," and nobody questions a thing that he makes the best choice for public safety.
An officer defends his (and others) life against a
fucking entitled robber, is exonerated by a Grand Jury that determines there is no reason to bring charges, and some people want to whine by inferring he didn't do what is constantly, consistently and credibly done by everyone in the field.
That's just rampant stupidity. At this point, there's no other name for it. It's like saying a pilot doesn't monitor his airspeed, altitude and position...
OF COURSE HE DOES, HE'S A FUCKING PILOT!
Jesus...