Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Economy
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old 04-25-2014, 03:36 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Sounds nice, but at some point if a society is going to do this an actual process will need to be established to carry out the objective. We've had and currently have some examples of how this approach has NOT worked. We also have an example of an approach that, warts and all, seems to work pretty well.

Also, all of the hand-wringing in this forum recently about the so called "death of the middle - class, there's plenty of to the contrary about income mobility in this country.

http://www.npr.org/2014/01/23/265356...wo-decades-ago

Also, the constant bleating about income inequality ignores the reality that the top rungs of income earners in this country are not a static and unchanging group of individuals. Its really more like a revolving door:

".... Thomas A. Hirschl of Cornell and I looked at 44 years of longitudinal data regarding individuals from ages 25 to 60 to see what percentage of the American population would experience these different levels of affluence during their lives. The results were striking.

It turns out that 12 percent of the population will find themselves in the top 1 percent of the income distribution for at least one year. What’s more, 39 percent of Americans will spend a year in the top 5 percent of the income distribution, 56 percent will find themselves in the top 10 percent, and a whopping 73 percent will spend a year in the top 20 percent of the income distribution."


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/20/op...rags.html?_r=1

Frankly, if given a choice, I'd vastly prefer a system that allows greater individual economic freedom and mobility, and the opportunity to succeed - or fail - based on what I contribute.

There will always be ass holes, as history shows, that will try to rig the game in their own favor, and some of them will succeed while others end up behind bars. No matter what economic system you deploy, you'll always have ass holes. I'd offer that our efforts at "leveling the playing field" by changing how our current system operates does more damage than the few ass holes who try to rig the game.
What should we do when the "assholes" start to outnumber the good guys? Just keep shuffling off to work with our heads down because; "It's their money, we have no right to ask more of them."?

F**k that BS.

Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.