Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
There are often cases where the reasons for keeping something classified no longer apply. There are also occasions when a document is classified solely to conceal wrongdoing on the part of those in power. In those cases the "people's right to know" should dictate that the information be declassified.
|
Once again, "in an effort" is not very substantive. Sounds good though. Beyond that, I'm not sure thats a door you want to open.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
Where was Richard Reid tried? How about Zacarias Moussaoui? Jose Padilla? Who was president then?
|
Bush. My comment was more to the fact that these trials are going to be held in a
Civilian court, in New York City. This upcoming trial is going to be far different than the above listed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
Congress wrote both the Stimulus and the Health Care bills. How can you possibly maintain that they were kept in the dark
|
You must be joking. Have you forgotten congress being asked to push though the Stimulus bill without time to read it because N.P. had to jet off to Europe. The same with the initial Health Care bills presented. How could the people know what was contained in them if congress had no clue. Thats a far cry from transparency.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
I think you need a rest, my friend. You're getting a bit shrill here.
John
|
Shrill?
Once again, surely your joking.
RC