Hunter a sign of things to come?

[Oerets]

The trial of the Presidents son a sign of what to expect if and when the trump fueled cult gains control of the "Justice Department"?

We all should be afraid this is a forewarning of things to come.

Retribution payback for perceived injustices brought upon them by the old rule of law, or Dems...

Not saying Hunter is not deserving of some punishment for his misdeeds. Just 99% of the population with similar charges gets a plea deal and fine...
Like he had until the cult needed to do something to distract from the many leaders legal issues.

Could not get the Father so go after the son...

[Noogies]

Just because Hunter is a sleazebag doesn't mean Joe's a bad president.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by Noogies

Just because Hunter is a sleazebag doesn't mean Joe's a bad president.

Try telling the entire Party Of Trump that.

[Oerets]

Originally Posted by RickeyM

Try telling the entire Party Of Trump that.

The same group who will tell you Biden is simple minded then go on to say he masterminded Trumps legal woes.

Granted Hunter is a very flawed individual. What needs to be drummed into the it seems closed minds out there.
Is it not right any who smokes pot and does not acknowledge this when buying a firearm is doing what Hunter is accused of?

[BigElCat]

I doubt we'll ever get to 'the bottom' of this story.

What was the Ukraine going to do with Uranium ?

IIRC, Russia pulled their nukes in the 1990s.

[Oerets]

For any who forgot what Ukraine gave up in exchange for .....



""But they were told at the time that the United States and Western powers — so certainly at least the United States and Great Britain — take their political commitments really seriously. This is a document signed at the highest level by the heads of state. So the implication was Ukraine would not be left to stand alone and face a threat should it come under one.
Thousands of nuclear arms had been left on Ukrainian soil by Moscow after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. But in the years that followed, Ukraine made the decision to completely denuclearize.""

In exchange, the U.S., the U.K. and Russia would guarantee Ukraine's security in a 1994 agreement known as the Budapest Memorandum.""


https://www.npr.org/2022/02/21/10821...putin-invasion

[BigElCat]

Hunter's not the guy you'd want cruising around with a laptop computer full of that nonsense.

"Dad, I locked the keys in the Corvette, it's starting to rain and the top is down. Have you seen my laptop computer" ?

[Oerets]

Nothing more telling of the differences between the two sides then with Hunter.

Where a Democrat will freely say Hunter is a very flawed and troubled individual. He appears to have committed crimes and if found guilty should be punished. Then we have Republicans who are willing to turn a blind eye to any and all crimes when it is one of them.

My point being there was a plea deal agreed upon. What happens all the time in such cases. Until politics and retribution yes retaliation. Due to the inability of getting the Father on anything...

Plus the added sorted details in testimony from any trial. Tit for tat, you do our guy we do yours...

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by BigElCat

I doubt we'll ever get to 'the bottom' of this story.

What was the Ukraine going to do with Uranium ?

IIRC, Russia pulled their nukes in the 1990's.

Accurate if you mean Russia pulled Ukraine's nukes. And I will just observe that no one ever invades nuclear-armed countries.

[BigElCat]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Accurate if you mean Russia pulled Ukraine's nukes. And I will just observe that no one ever invades nuclear-armed countries.

That is what I meant.

IIRC, Hunter's laptop had something to do with Uranium being imported to the Ukraine. The 'story' became obscure along to the way.

To be even more accurate, no one is 'yet' to invade a nuclear armed country.

Billions of dollars (and rubles) have been spent entertaining the idea. Howitzer fired tactical nukes. Soldiers standing underneath nuke warheads being detonated.

It's just a bad idea in general.

Nor should the USA be providing conventional missiles to strike inside of Russia, with the expectation that our rules will be followed regarding their use. Yeah right. Just my opinion.