Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
View Poll Results: Allow the Filibuster 60 vote rule in Senate
Yes 1 11.11%
No 7 77.78%
Care less! 1 11.11%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2021, 10:30 AM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,933
Filibuster in or out?

Just where do you stand and why on the Senate and Filibuster?

Allow the 60 vote threshold or simple majority?

I say 50 plus one.

We have been shown the Republicans can not be trusted to act with the countries best interests in mind. Past practices and current actions should make any future apparent. Reach a hand in bipartisanship across the isle and it will be slapped back!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-26-2021, 11:57 AM
RickeyM RickeyM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,532
If the Republican party were interested in something other than obstructionism we could leave the filibuster in place.
__________________
The first casualty of war is the truth.
[ Greek dramatist Aeschylus ]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-26-2021, 02:46 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
Just stacks the senate even more in favor of the small population rural red states.
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-26-2021, 03:38 PM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickeyM View Post
If the Republican party were interested in something other than obstructionism we could leave the filibuster in place.
Been there had it done to us already.
Time to remember fool me once......

Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
Just stacks the senate even more in favor of the small population rural red states.

Yes a carryover from slavery for sure.


You think, it is time to quit being nice, rational with good intentions to a party controlled by those who that condone Coups and hostile takeovers...!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-26-2021, 04:31 PM
Mark B Mark B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Minnesota Iron Range
Posts: 702
That's a big hell no!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-26-2021, 04:49 PM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark B View Post
That's a big hell no!


+1.................
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-27-2021, 06:43 PM
barbara's Avatar
barbara barbara is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,237
Can someone explain the whole filibuster thing to me? I know how it happens, a politician talks and talks and talks, but, I'm just not sure of how this tactic works and what it works for or against.
Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-27-2021, 07:21 PM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,933
Originally, yes it was a filibuster was a long winded speech intended to draw attention to a issue. In hope of gaining support or airing of grievances. The evolution to how it has been in use dates back to slavery as a means to allow a minority to stall or shelf legislation.
This was accomplished by the agreement to speed up floor debate by allowing a 60 vote majority vote on legislation if filibuster was triggered by a senator.
The senate sets up the rule by a simple majority vote to then allow a 60 vote threshold and what type of bills to include. Budget, judges ....
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-27-2021, 09:54 PM
Mark B Mark B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Minnesota Iron Range
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbara View Post
Can someone explain the whole filibuster thing to me? I know how it happens, a politician talks and talks and talks, but, I'm just not sure of how this tactic works and what it works for or against.
Thanks in advance.
There's no time limit for how long a filibuster can last. Under current Senate rules the only way to end a filibuster is by getting 60 votes in favor of ending debate so a vote can be taken on the legislation being debated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibu..._States_Senate
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-28-2021, 10:30 AM
barbara's Avatar
barbara barbara is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,237
Thanks for the explanations. So, if I am understanding this correctly, the party in power (currently the democrats) would be against a filibuster.... right?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.