You reap what you sow, Dems

[whell]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

It's the attitude man, the attitude you take.

You're right. I take a lot of attitude around here. I'm just giving back. I'm a giver.

[nailer]

Originally Posted by whell

Yeah, your lefty pals like to pick on girls too apparently. So what's your point?

http://mynorthwest.com/503634/flyer-...right-speaker/

Nothing new here. Hate begets hate.

Good to know Neo Nazis are you buds.

Nazi/Jewish is the point.

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by whell

You have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to what I support.

You transparently and emphatically support Trump, and thereby his misogyny, racism, bigotry, incompetence, fascism, etc. You appear immune to rational thought, always supporting your Dear Leader in whatever misadventure he engages.

The fact that he's a danger to our great democratic experiment seems lost on you. You are as guilty as the "Good Germans" who sympathized with their tyrant, or looked the other way. You are implicit in Trump's and Brannon's attempts to destroy our democratic institutions.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

You transparently and emphatically support Trump, and thereby his misogyny, racism, bigotry, incompetence, fascism, etc. You appear immune to rational thought, always supporting your Dear Leader in whatever misadventure he engages.

The fact that he's a danger to our great democratic experiment seems lost on you. You are as guilty as the "Good Germans" who sympathized with their tyrant, or looked the other way. You are implicit in Trump's and Brannon's attempts to destroy our democratic institutions.

If that's all true, then you're as guilty as the guy who shot Scalise. Deal with it.

[whell]

Originally Posted by nailer

Good to know Neo Nazis are you buds.

I see you're logic, or lack thereof, is aligned with Chicks. Lovely.

[d-ray657]

Originally Posted by whell

If that's all true, then you're as guilty as the guy who shot Scalise. Deal with it.

And to think that you challenge the logic employed by others. The person who shot Scalise was an individual with particular political beliefs. He acted on his own and with devices that many on the left believe should be regulated and difficult for him to obtain. There is no reason to assign his individual act of criminal conduct to any particular political persuasion.

Trump and Bannon, however, are wielding actual power. They have tremendous influence over matters of life and death for other citizens. Because of the positions they hold, they are accountable to the public. Their acts are attributable to the party that gave Trump the nomination to carry its banner (your party, by the way). No one gave Scalise's shooter any representative status.

You are a consistent violator of the rules of logic. In this instance, you committed your favorite offense - the false equivalency.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

The 'you're another' defense. We here, on PC, the 'whatever sort of people you like to argue with,' are against online harassment and the politics of personal abuse and hate, whoever does it. Can and will you, whell, on PC, say the same?

Or not?

Whell, I remind you that 'no answer' leaves you failing to stand against online harassment and the politics of personal abuse and hate. I suggest you consider your response further.

[nailer]

Originally Posted by whell

I see you're logic, or lack thereof, is aligned with Chicks. Lovely.

The buddy reference was tounge in cheek.

Why not address the main point of the post?

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by nailer

The buddy reference was tounge in cheek.

Why not address the main point of the post?

Intent is to swat, not engage in any meaningful discussion.
Actually it works for me; Lefty bad, righty deranged.

[nailer]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

And to think that you challenge the logic employed by others. The person who shot Scalise was an individual with particular political beliefs. He acted on his own and with devices that many on the left believe should be regulated and difficult for him to obtain. There is no reason to assign his individual act of criminal conduct to any particular political persuasion.

Trump and Bannon, however, are wielding actual power. They have tremendous influence over matters of life and death for other citizens. Because of the positions they hold, they are accountable to the public. Their acts are attributable to the party that gave Trump the nomination to carry its banner (your party, by the way). No one gave Scalise's shooter any representative status.

You are a consistent violator of the rules of logic. In this instance, you committed your favorite offense - the false equivalency.

The article whell posted to counter Chicks' was indeed weak. However he does often make good points, but his desire to piss on his political enemies usually results in a damp crotch.