Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Economy
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-08-2015, 04:51 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by doucanoe View Post
Be that as it may, using the term full employment or even approaching full employment is a bit silly based on how these figures are calculated.
Whether you think it a bit silly or not, when people who are looking for work find it and the rate at which they're finding it exceeds the rate at which new people enter the work force, we are approaching full employment. That's simply a fact and in no way carries the implication that full employment will be achieved or is even achievable.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-08-2015, 05:03 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
Whether you think it a bit silly or not, when people who are looking for work find it and the rate at which they're finding it exceeds the rate at which new people enter the work force, we are approaching full employment. That's simply a fact and in no way carries the implication that full employment will be achieved or is even achievable.

John
Using the definition used by economists for full employment, it is definitely attainable. ~6% unemployment used to be considered full employment (below which inflationary pressures would be too great). In our new reality, economists haven't settled on what unemployment rate constitutes full employment, but it's more in the range of 4% it seems.

We're at 5.5% now and it hasn't created wage inflation. That's part of what is making the Fed's policymakers' jobs difficult. At what unemployment rate will inflation become an issue and necessitate an interest rate hike? We ain't there yet, it seems.

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fullemployment.asp
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-06-2015, 02:08 PM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,189
Back to the main thrust of the title.

Taxing the rich:

http://america.aljazeera.com/opinion...tea-party.html
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-06-2015, 02:59 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion View Post
Back to the main thrust of the title.

Taxing the rich:

http://america.aljazeera.com/opinion...tea-party.html
The Republican governors are right to be thinking of ditching trickle-down but the people who vote for them don't realize it.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-06-2015, 03:11 PM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
The Republican governors are right to be thinking of ditching trickle-down but the people who vote for them don't realize it.

John
True! Many of them vote against their own interest, often being caught up in some manipulated side issues.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.