|
|
|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|

06-26-2009, 06:45 AM
|
|
Abby Normal
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumpy
I do care to some degree that others are getting cared for but my neighbors health care is not my responsibility nor is the raising of their children nor anything else that does not pertain to my own family. Its not our governments responsibility either IMO.
.
|
Although I believe that we are one sociaty that should require those that profit most from that sociaty to give back the most to that sociaty I have no issue with you or anyone having a different philosophy as long as after we vote we both respect the majority.
All in all, I would say that the right has had more power since WWII and this has been the reason our country is not as progressive as most other developed nations.
You think this good, I think this bad, we vote then go have a beer.
|

06-26-2009, 06:46 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,943
|
|
|
Sure they have great values since they are responsible for a large part of the loss of American manufacturing jobs sent over seas. They make their money off the backs country's willing to work for pennies and sell it to fat Americans for large profits. All the while screwing their employee with no benefits and sticking our government with some of their employee heath care. They are a scum bag company that will rot in hell some day.
|

06-26-2009, 06:47 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,943
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal
Although I believe that we are one sociaty that should require those that profit most from that sociaty to give back the most to that sociaty I have no issue with you or anyone having a different philosophy as long as after we vote we both respect the majority.
All in all, I would say that the right has had more power since WWII and this has been the reason our country is not as progressive as most other developed nations.
You think this good, I think this bad, we vote then go have a beer.
|
Lets just hope we all get to keep that right to vote. I'll buy the first round
|

06-26-2009, 07:50 AM
|
 |
Resident octogenarian
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
|
|
|
I'll disagree a bit about the Right having too much power since WW II. They would have considered the GI Bill as socialism, yet it was that very bill that gave America the technological edge. We are squanering it now by filling our universities with foreign students and pricing a degree out of reach of most American families.
Hey, much as some may like or not like the government at least they don't go around shooting citizens like Dinnerjacket does (thanks for the nickname combwork)
|

03-21-2010, 07:40 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 26
|
|
|
Please review Post #1 and comment. Thanks.
|

03-22-2010, 07:35 AM
|
 |
Resident octogenarian
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumpy
Because NO ONE is more greedy then the US goverment. Specially with the Dems holding our wallets. They are spending what we dont have and if they aint careful we are all gonna be even broker.
Lets not even get in to the paperwork clusterfuck they will slap us all with. Anyone remember the last one with medicare.
|
Our doctor here has two full time clerks who only deal with the paperwork. The last time I was in his office one of them was one the phone and I heard her giving the doctor's fax number before she hung up. She then turned around and said "Can you believe this, eleven minutes on the phone to get them to fax me a damn form". This was the health insurance company, not the government.
We currently spend twice what other industrialized countries do and get lousy service. Some minor clerk in your health insurance company make "medical decisions" for you, not your doctor. All I ever see from medicare is the form some private outfit they 'outsourced' this to that tells me what medicare has paid on my behalf (I got two this year because I had two flu shots). I gather they do this to prevent fraud, sure they do, so if someone gets a motorized scooter because the outfit bamboozled medicare to get it for them they will report it?
I am sorry but in the 25 years I have been here my experience is that if you really want something screwed up beyond belief give it to private industry. Why are electric rates here twice that of Ontario and Quebec? Why does getting a motgage cost an arm and a leg?
Feh!
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
|

03-22-2010, 07:47 AM
|
 |
Resident octogenarian
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeCh
With all the HUGE spending looming in the near future with Nationalized Medicine, repaying the Stimulator, repaying the Auto Bailouts, Bank Bailouts, etc. etc. etc. .......is it possible that "IF" these ventures are "SEEN" eventually as bad decisions, will we as a country have a way out?
As an example: If everything goes the way of Nationalized Medicine (and not toward using the two tools in place already...Medicare, Medicaid) and things get spun up for full production; processes and procedures are written up by the volumes; hoards are hired to "manage"; funds are spent in the near-trillions ALL within the current presidency tenure (could be four or eight years depending).....IF, IF it all stacks up to be a MASSIVE mistake and we as a country recognize it, CAN we ever go back to the private venue?
I guess what I'm getting at, is that this president seems to be railing BIG BIG items into place with extremely damaging results if things don't "play out" as suggested.
Will we ever be able to go back to Private Medicine if the Government run Medicine doesn't pan out? Is this (what we are about to dive into) the point of no return?
Mike
|
Well to your first point what was voted on yesterday is not nationalized medicine by a long shot. Those trillions spent were not all spent by Obama or have you forgotten Hank Paulson and George W? So far we seem to be getting much of it back with interest.
You seem to have forgotten what else was voted in yesterday, getting the private banks out of the public trough. This means increasing Pell grants so maybe more of OUR people will get through university and not some damn foreign student who will then go back home and use his training to screw us.
Again Mike it is not government run insurance, sadly this bill does not kill off Aetna, U.S. Healthcare or Kaiser Permanente, would that it did.
I only hope Churchill was right.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
|

03-28-2010, 06:43 PM
|
 |
Area Man
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,451
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by soundhound
i hope not. but why would you want to? would it not be more prudent to make it pan out?
i've heard a lot of excuses from the pro-privatized health-care folk. it's all a bunch of manure if you ask me. of course they are against socialized medicine, they are making a fortune. allow me to dispell a few of the myths:
1) socialized medicine would take away my free choice of health care providers.
i don't see why it would. if you required medical care, and didn't want to go to a public clinic, i'm sure there would be some doctors more than willing to take your cash.
for many, the choice is get healthcare, or eat. and for many, there is no choice.
2) quality of care would diminish.
manure. the same people who are treating you now would be treating you then. pride in their job and compassion for those they treat would keep them right on providing the best care they possibly could.
3) our country can't afford it.
what can it afford? but seriously folks, we're paying through the nose for healthcare now. our country spends more on healthcare than any other. and the costs are reflected in other areas as well. remember that a healthy workforce is a productive workforce. look, the government is paying one way or the other.
4) with the government in charge, the system would be a cluster-f***.
okay, i can't argue with this one, however it would be better than nothing at all. yes, the government is inefficient and cumbersome, but it does work. naturally there would be problems with the system. but these could be worked through and corrected just as we now attempt and occasionally succeed fixing the many other government run programs.
in the end, face the facts. privatized medicine has failed. too many people aren't getting it, or at reduced levels. too many people are being ruined financially because of it. we are losing our manufacturing base partially due to it. it is being abused by the industry itself. as a whole, we are a nation of un-healthy people.
next time you hear someone talking about the ills of socialized medicine, stop to think about who they work for.
|
Thanks, Man. Not I don't feel so all alone.
Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
|

03-28-2010, 06:54 PM
|
 |
Area Man
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,451
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeCh
With all the HUGE spending looming in the near future with Nationalized Medicine, repaying the Stimulator, repaying the Auto Bailouts, Bank Bailouts, etc. etc. etc. .......is it possible that "IF" these ventures are "SEEN" eventually as bad decisions, will we as a country have a way out?
As an example: If everything goes the way of Nationalized Medicine (and not toward using the two tools in place already...Medicare, Medicaid) and things get spun up for full production; processes and procedures are written up by the volumes; hoards are hired to "manage"; funds are spent in the near-trillions ALL within the current presidency tenure (could be four or eight years depending).....IF, IF it all stacks up to be a MASSIVE mistake and we as a country recognize it, CAN we ever go back to the private venue?
I guess what I'm getting at, is that this president seems to be railing BIG BIG items into place with extremely damaging results if things don't "play out" as suggested.
Will we ever be able to go back to Private Medicine if the Government run Medicine doesn't pan out? Is this (what we are about to dive into) the point of no return?
Mike
|
Why are you such a pessimist? What, you don't have any faith at all in this country or its people? Of course there is a storm ahead. Of course there will be problems to work out. Of course there will be massive debt to deal with.
No one has ever acheived great things without taking risks or paying a heavy price. That's just how it is.
Or, we should just "play it safe", and let the current system grow evermore expensive until it fails, then leave millions more without access? Sorry, but to my ears, this sounds like the logic of "quitters".
FDR once said; "Conservatives are men of narrow mind, who live in constant fear of the future."
Seems like the GOP is determined to prove him right, IMHO.
Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Last edited by BlueStreak; 03-29-2010 at 07:25 AM.
|

03-28-2010, 06:59 PM
|
|
Abby Normal
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak
FDR once said; "Conservatives are men of narrow mind, who live in constant fear of the future."
|
Wow, he hit the nail on the head. (if you consider todays GOP conservative)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.
|