Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles
Well, I'll try to make a case.
From what I've read Zimmerman followed Trayvon, which is legal, but Trayvon started the confrontation with an assault.
And a I find any statement that Zimmerman simply murdered a child coming back from a candy store to be beyond plausibility. They put you in jail for that, there has to be more to it.
Perhaps Zimmerman was a zealot, then again, perhaps he was simply a concerned citizen trying to do the right thing, and the whole deal went south.
I don't know. But I do know that we are viewing the same situation and coming up with diametrically opposing conclusions.
I "get it", are you sure that you do?
Chas
|
If Trevor hit Zimmerman first it has little if any relevance since Zimmerman was stalking him.
I think it's a normal reaction when threatened to lash out in an attempt to turn the tide of an anticipated victimization.
The kid had no gun to "frighten off" Zimmerman.
Zimmerman had a gun and instead of frightening off the kid if this is what happened he killed him!
Honest, there is literally no way Zimmerman can walk.
Yes we are coming up with a dramatically different conclusion and that is both amazing and frankly very sad.
I think the right needs to pick a less obvious aggression to champion their cultural beliefs.
Look at it this way Chas, had Zimmerman not been playing cop Trayvon would be alive.
Had Zimmerman listen to the police Trayvon would be alive.
Had Zimmerman not carried a gun Trayvon would be alive.
All you folks making excuses for Zimmerman, what if your kid went to the store for candy and never returned?