View Single Post
  #116  
Old 03-03-2012, 06:38 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
I didn't skip it nor did she. She believes that's what's wrong.

So, you want to close don't religious schools? Terrific. What a wonderful tolerant lot today's liberal are.

And, of course, the tax dollars it receives are in exchange for services performed. They aren't gifts from Uncle Sam.
First sentence - wrong. She believes that it's wrong for the school to prevent the insurance she paid for from providing a prescription medication, and that it is wrong for the school to make a woman endure cross-examination in order to receive such medication.

Second sentence. Wrong. If religions institutions are going to operate in the secular sphere, however, they must comply with secular law.

Third sentence. Wrong. The funding supports the institution's function as an educational institution. To the extent that it performs services for any of the federal funding it receives, it becomes a federal vendor. You wanna do business with the feds, you do it by the same rules as anyone else.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote