Thread: Lol!!!!!!!
View Single Post
  #30  
Old 01-28-2012, 08:00 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by djv8ga View Post
Just think how hard it would be to run the high voltage gear that was used back then with those solar panels. That crap wouldn't run my 11 meter radio amps.
Get real dude.
Quote:
Originally Posted by djv8ga View Post
Really doesn't matter. Solar power is for low voltage.
Look at a vintage Mac running all of those 6LQ6's with that large transformer. That was MODERN tech back in 1969! Do you really believe that 6 MODERN solar panels would run that beast today?
Come on dude.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak View Post
Ummmmmmmmm....not really. State of the art technology in the space program and the military was way ahead of consumer electronics. And, I believe the solar panels were only supplimentary to generator power and battery storage. They didn't run on solar alone.

Where's Pete?

Dave
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
fuel cells.
Quote:
Originally Posted by djv8ga View Post
Doing what?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak View Post
Storing fuel. What in the hell do you think?

Dave
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
No, it's a chemical based generator of electricity. 'Taint no gas tank.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak View Post
Whatever. Point is the lunar vehicle wasn't solely dependant on solar panels.
Are you okay with that statement?

Dave
You are barking up the wrong tree, don't get me wrong. I'm of the opinion that the denial of the moon missions is a cracked pot idea and delusional."Power was provided by two 36-volt silver-zinc potassium hydroxide non-rechargeable batteries" wikipedia. There were no solar panels involved. I trust that I've answered your question.
Reply With Quote