Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
OK. Do you have any evidence to suggest that he compelled a female staffer to post the picture of him in his BVD's? You're grasping at straws (again). There is absolutely nothing to suggest that this has anything to do with workplace sexual harassment.
FYI, sexual harassment is defined as "unwelcome verbal, visual, or physical conduct of a sexual nature that is severe or pervasive and affects working conditions or creates a hostile work environment.”
|
It wouldn't need to be posted by a staffer. If it was posted by him, and one of his staffers saw it while accessing / updating his site, it could be grounds for a harassment claim, and it would fit the definition of a visual form of harassment. There have been workplace claims that have been brought based on less egregious visuals.