View Single Post
  #63  
Old 04-03-2024, 07:10 AM
RickeyM RickeyM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rajoo View Post
Today the company that owns the ship already made a statement to the effect that they are not liable for the bridge damage (means they blame everyone else) and that any liability will be capped at around $48 Million, assume its the policy limit. Its just a standard statement, does not mean anything.
I guess their next step is blaming the bridge for damaging their ship?
__________________
The first casualty of war is the truth.
[ Greek dramatist Aeschylus ]
Reply With Quote