If you don't want to answer the question I asked, just say so. Your meandering post above comes off as an attempt to be evasive.
Yeah, left-wing WaPo and NY Times certainly kept you and yours spun up for years.
Yeah, I'd call your posts bullshit too. Finally, we agree on something.
Check it out, Finnster. Lots of media outlets have reported on Biden's "work" with Burisma. Solomon didn't have an exclusive on the story. Biden receiving payment from Burisma isn't a "conspiracy". No one is denying it happened.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/nat...2018-rcna29462
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/1...imony-00125056
https://www.wsj.com/video/series/opi...3-301BBB0F63D2
Not the type of self-criticism I was referring to. As I said earlier, there's no criticism of the lefty bias. In fact, the author said he thought that was a good thing.
My remarks above harken back to something you said in an earlier post:
What's truly ironic is that conservatives demand absolutely true, unbiased reporting with zero mistakes from mainstream outlets (that they mostly don't read anyway), while simultaneously demanding that conservative outlets comfort them with a security blanket of lies (as clearly shown by discovery in the Dominion case). Whassup with that, Mr. Fake News?
I think everyone should demand unbiased reporting. Zero mistakes are an aspiration, but mistakes do happen.
But then you state:
while simultaneously demanding that conservative outlets comfort them with a security blanket of lies.
This brings us back to the question you refuse to answer. You want to criticize "conservative outlets" for doing the exact same things that left-wing media outlets do. You've just described, for example, what MSNBC does for lefties 24-7. But you don't seem to want to talk about that.
Figures.