Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
I suppose it depends on who he listens to. Bannon was apoplectic about Turley's admission that there's no there there. Whell can now be relied upon to wait until the GOP figures out how to spin this debacle for their faithful. Then he'll chime in with something profoundly stupid and shriek "strawman" or "logical fallacy" when we call him out for his dumbfounding credulity.
Here's an apt take this shit show inside a dumpster fire attempting to regurgitate Rudy's nonsense that got Trump impeached.
The impeachment inquiry against Biden remains an evidence-free farce put on by a party in cult-like grip to a con artist treading water in an ocean of legal jeopardy.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...s/70995287007/ |
From the article:
Quote:
|
In fact, for anyone who hasn’t marinated in the fetid swamps of Hunter Biden conspiracy theories, most of the hearing would sound like a bunch of lawmakers rambling on about obscure, poorly written political fan fiction.
|
So based on their allegations of wrongdoing, which they have no proof of, they're going in search of proof to justify their accusations. Did I get that right?
We'll get him with the next witness for sure...