Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
What a couple of tools! Yes, the first link says exactly that. The point of posting the Politico story - FROM 2019 - was to illustrate that there's nothing new to the allegations. Folks have known about the unethical use of Biden's name in their business dealings for years. What's also interesting and unsettling are the individuals they've chosen to do business with, and the legal issues that follow those folks.
The 2nd link's purpose was to show that things have changed since 2019, and that we now know that Biden's denials about his involvement in his son's business dealings, including businesses linked to the Chinese Communist Party, don't survive scrutiny.
Leave it to you to septic tanks to lie and mischaracterize my post. This is exactly the process you use to "win" arguments.
|
List specifically the laws Biden broke and the underlying, verified actions supporting these claims. Otherwise, you are pissing in the wind. Again.