Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
I did indeed. Contrary to the wingnut opinions casting aspersions against the mention of overt acts in the indictment (that they are not all criminal acts), the law is clear that they need not themselves be criminal acts, but acts taken to further the conspiracy. OTOH, predicate acts (under Georgia (and Fed)) RICO laws must be criminal and those predicate acts charged in the indictment are indeed criminal (while no non-criminal overt acts were charged).
This is yet another non-issue that represents a misunderstanding or deliberate obfuscation of the relevant law to rile the rubes (it seems to again have worked on you).
|
Yep. If you go out and buy lunch for the gang planning the bank robbery, that can be the overt act that gets you in the conspiracy.
On edit: now see you whellsplained it after he 'didn't get it' the first time. He probably still won't get it, of course. He's not here to get things.