Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
It seems pretty obvious that you have not read the indictment. Read every word of it before arguing such nonsense.
|
I did read it, you snarky little twerp. It prompted the questions I asked above.
For example, in the indictment, stated that "...Trump caused scores of boxes, many of which contained classified information, to be transported to Mar a Lago....". The wording is important and can be an avenue for the defense to challenge, as noted in the post above. Unless it can be proven by the prosecution that Trump supervised the packing of the boxes right down to seeing and approving every item placed in those boxes, then - because this is a criminal case - there's reasonable doubt that Trump caused the movement of the classified materials.
Defense attorneys are skilled at finding ways to cast doubt. The defense doesn't need to provide innocence, but the prosecution must convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that a law was broken. The point is that there is a lot of opportunity based on what's in the indictment to cast doubt.