Quote:
Originally Posted by BigElCat
The Romans crucified Christ, because they wanted to retain law and order in Jerusalem, but they did not have enough boots on the grounds to fight the Jews until 70 years later.
They did not even want to do it because Jesus had not broken any of their laws, only the Jewish law of blaspheme against a God they did not believe in.
The "white supremist christian nationalists" have not been been in power and control of the US economy for over 100 years, the Zionist have this control, and they will retain this control even over the Democrats.
We just have be thankful for these boon years. And they have been good. Now it's time to pay up what we owe, and die homeless without proper medical care or food. Or join the military in it's crusade against Communists and the enemies of the Nation State Israel.
I'll be back to addres the "blood libel bullshit". It's not what Ike thinks it is. Gotta go to work, and be a good slave.
|
Heard it all before. Every one of you puts your own little twist on your anti-Semitism. In an attempt to ward off the accusations of anti-Semitism. But it's always the same blood libel bullshit. Jesus of Nazareth was a revolutionary. A religiius and social revolutionary.The establishment rabbis didn't like him, and he wasnt fond of them either. But the Romans crucified revolutionaries...the rabbis never crucified anybody. No Jew killed Jesus of Nazareth.
"Bllod Libel" carries with it several meanings. One of them is all about drinking the blood of murdered christian children. But is also refers to the "Jews killed jesus" bullshit from anti-Semites like you. Crucifixion is a Roman invention. The Romans executed revolutionaries.