Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
Yet. Durham's investigation is still on-going
My criticism was pretty specific. What we got from the millions spent on the Mueller investigation was the full force and weight of the Federal gov't loosed on individuals in search of collusion with Russia relating to the 2016 election, and Mueller's report specifically found no evidence that anyone in the Trump did so. But a prosecutor can't spend all that time and money and come up with nothing, so Mueller hung a few scalps over process crimes.
Durham's not done yet. But if the results are similar to Mueller's, I'll be just as critical.
|
BS. Both Mueller and the GOP-led Senate Select Committee on Intelligence concluded that Russia used Republican political operative Paul Manafort and WikiLeaks to try to help Trump win the 2016 election and that Trump welcomed this assistance and appeared to coordinate with Wikileaks (through Roger Stone and Bannon).
Furthermore, despite the above conclusions from Mueller and the SSCI,
“several individuals affiliated with the Trump Campaign lied to the Office,” and
“those lies materially impaired the investigation of Russian election interference.”
If you want to read something from a reputable source rather than the MAGA nonsense you're so steeped in, here's a good rundown on the collusion aspects of Mueller:
https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/g...-on-collusion/