Quote:
Originally Posted by Not Insane
Actually, I do it to address specific points and not get lost in rabbit trails. It is important to determine what someone actually means when they say something before you can respond. It's critical when I read contracts. Sometimes you have to read a sentence two or three times to understand what is actually being said. I was probably in error in my first response to the "echo chamber" comment because I had not CAREFULLY tried to analyze the meanings of all the words and divined what he meant with words like "silo" and "farm"
I've never been banned for a rules violation. That is why I was active in internet forums since 1997, but once the cancel culture kicked in after the virus mandates started, I was being banned from several sites for saying things they "didn't like". No ad-hom. No profanity. I wasn't even going "off topic. It was for just not toeing the line of group think.
I was banned from one site for merely posting a video of senate testimony, and the reason for banning? "Posting conspiracy theory crap."
That's why so many people are ecstatic about what's happening at twitter. We'll see if it sticks.
|
Must've been some hogwash from that possum headed senator Randi Paul. (rolls eyes)