View Single Post
  #99  
Old 02-19-2018, 12:45 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
So, what's the right answer from your perspective?...
What Maryland did was a good start, along with significant background checks and training requirements for firearms ownership. All would easily pass constitutional muster if the GOP had the balls to buck the NRA on the subject. Maryland also has rigorous requirements for concealed carry. It too has passed muster with the courts.

I'm a Maryland resident and gun owner (and have been for over 50 years) and don't feel a bit put out by either of these laws.

Another law that exists in four states (CA, WA, IN, CT) could have prevented the Parkland shooting and many more like it, a Gun Violence Restraining Order. Even with the criticism of the FBI in the Parkland case, there's nothing they could have done without such a law in place. He bought his AR-15 legally despite many run-ins with local law enforcement and social services.

None of these laws are news to anybody who knows anything about gun laws, yet Congressional Republicans won't even entertain debate on any of them. What ever happened to their promise to do something about bump stocks?
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.

Last edited by finnbow; 02-19-2018 at 01:20 PM.
Reply With Quote