Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
If correct, and we don't know that for certain, sounds like George P was burnishing his credentials for providing opposition research. He was reportedly looking to build a Christopher Steele-like "dossier" on Clinton, possibly using the same or similar "Russian contacts" that Steele has used.
Whether that's "not good" or not? Doubtful that its horrible. That's why there seems like a lot we don't know.
|
Paying an American research firm to continue its investigations into Trump's shady history (started at the behest of the Rubio campaign), including his campaign's collusion with Russia, is itself collusion? Who knew?
As for Pop simply burnishing his credentials, why was that necessary? He was already mentioned as an excellent guy by Trump a few weeks earlier and was given a seat at the table at a national security meeting in a photo posted by the Trump campaign.