Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
Yet, the sources that you use to cite the your claim of "nearly universal agreement" are themselves often biased. What this breaks down to is a scenario where both sides of the discussion end up rejecting each other's arguments without even considering them, like you just did.
|
Sorry, real science isn't biased. It's peer reviewed, time after time, to ensure that it's as accurate as possible, leading to consensus. The consensus is clear. There is no doubt. Your fake news sites are funded by those who would benefit by obfuscating the facts. Wake up! Why do you continue to post nonsense? You would have been a "good German" under Hitler. Or are you a "good Russian" under Putin?