Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
First, in post 35, you engage in a complete flight of fancy about what you believe Trump "knows" about Russian hacking (based apparently on your mind reading skills  ), then you challenge me about evidence? Finn, you're unhinged. |
I said "he knows full well that Russia is
highly likely to have been involved." If he (or you) don't believe it is
highly likely Russia was involved (given their history and the evidence), you both disagree with the FBI and the CIA on the issue for no other reason that it may be inconvenient.
Quote:
Here are a couple of pieces of evidence for you:
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Donna Brazille
You might have noticed that both have lost their roles in the DNC due to emails that were intercepted and made public. Whoever grabbed those emails didn't have to falsify a thing. The truth of what each was doing was enough, and it would have been the truth if Trump were a candidate or not.
|
Who said anything about anybody having to falsify anything? That's completely irrelevant. We're talking about hacking private conversations and publishing them, both a crime and an attempt to manipulate the election. If this same party hacked the RNC and Steve Bannon's emails, there would have also been plenty of unsavory sausage-making for the electorate to see, had the hacker favored Hillary's victory. Again, you conveniently miss the point or are simply trying to obfuscate.