Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Joad
I'm fine with that. The problem with the house seats is Gerrymandering. That's another issue.
Doing it on purpose doesn't make it right.
Well that depends on who you ask.
I have a huge problem with Wyoming getting a Senator for every 192,000 population while California only gets one for every 19.4 million. That's a difference of about 100-1.
|
You think gerrymandering is bad now. Try it with both the Senate and the House with representation being determined by population.
And besides - what's to be gained by this other than adding a bunch more talking heads in the Senate? All I see is a larger vacuum cleaner that can be used to suck up lobbying money and campaign contributions.