Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode
I must've missed the part where Gravity said this was an "equal pay for all" scheme. The owner raised the base pay to $70k. Your pinko argument needs more straw, Was.
|
Gravity didn't say it, but I said it. Was caught me in a goof.
So the bet should refer to 'minimum pay of $70,000 per year,' not equal pay for all. I'll correct my previous post accordingly, so there will be no confusion about the proposed stakes of the 'bet.'