Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal
of course you are correct. The problem is people like me.
I see a drop dead drunk and his wife collecting well over $200,000 annually as retired teachers and know how hard Ike and I worked and human nature sets in. Why should I pay for such outlandish retirements to people who worked
outrageously fewer hours in a job that was for losers when they took them.
(Sorry, my virtue is not what it should be the last month or so.)
|
A little bit harsh. Just because you choose to work in a different field with a different set of promises if any. No reason to now say one who choose to work with with a promise of a retirement to begrudge them now it is time to pay.
As to the person working fewer hours, don't know many teacher do you?
Plus if the person has a problem effecting their performance would they not have been weeded out before retirement? I know here the spot light is on the teachers and one with any hint of a dependency problem is gone ASAP! They are Union members in the public system if they choose to be.
Barney