12-28-2014, 12:47 PM
|
 |
Reformed Know-Nothing
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeamOn
There was a lot of information too that led up to the Iraq war but lacked credibility which very few questioned. Very same principle applies here. Lot of information but consider the sources and the vested interests. Ferguson PD, the DA who was under pressure to recuse himself and the Grand Jury process; wrought with conflicts of interest.
So you accept the testimony verbatim of a surgeon in a medical malpractice case? Or bring in other surgeons and guess whose side they will take? Hint: they too carry malpractice insurance and really cannot practice without it.
Now after the Grand Jury verdict in NY on the Garner case, would any informed rational citizen trust the Grand Jury process? That's your problem with the law and order types, strong arguments with a weak case and you have to keep repeating yourself. Rings hollow.
|
What's your solution?
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
|