Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke
No.
1. It's ugly.
2. Lawful at the time.
What I wanted -- which we got -- is an admission that we did it, haven't in years, and won't do so again (which, of course, we could and we'd never hear about it but you know what I mean).
Retroactive prosecution due to current malem prohibitum is crap: it needed to be illegal, then.
|
It was, both in terms of our own laws and an international treaty we were signatories to.