Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
Zeke is just offering an alternate narrative to that force-fed by the Democrats and their compliant media (e.g., MSNBC). There are two sides to every story, and the way it looks his side is probably closer to what actually happened. That really pisses off those of you who went so far out on a limb with charges of a public execution.
|
And it's going to annoy them more after Grand Jury exoneration
and a potential-but-unlikely civil rights trail fiasco leading to some quick minor insurance bucks versus a second acquittal or inability to collect. (There's been no Zimmerman civil rights trail and he killed someone without training, authority, evidenced attack or presumed remorse...)
If you attack an officer in his cruiser and/or wheel back on him afterwards? While still within a zone of potential lethality?
You get shot until you're no longer a threat. That's been long standing codified as legally fine within the purview of those trained and sworn to police society, upheld MANY times.
As for the Huffington Post link below, who read to the bottom?
"...
As with most police abuse issues, the real failure here is on the part of the elected officials. They're the ones who can't resist the urge to incessantly declare "war" on things, who are responsible for setting the policies that have given rise to this culture..."
As I previously stated.
If foolish troglodytes desire to take issue with what occurred in Ferguson, take issue with something other than an officer who was
well within his personal and professional right to defend his life from a -- as it turns out -- large entitled and drugged individual who had just committed robbery...
