View Single Post
  #104  
Old 10-22-2014, 06:10 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke View Post
Precisely. Which is why you keep shooting until the threat is neutralized.



Yes. We accept that Wilson should have been a better shot.

David Klinger, an associate professor in the department of criminology and criminal justice at the University of Missouri–St Louis and a former officer with the Los Angeles police department, said there are two permissible circumstances in which an officer can use lethal force.
  • Constitutionally, a police officer can shoot a suspect who is threatening the life of the officer, a fellow officer or a member of the public, said Klinger, a use-of-force expert. This is known as the “defence of life” standard.

  • An officer can also shoot a fleeing suspect if the officer believes the suspect has committed a violent felony and his or her escape would pose a significant and serious threat, he said.

Brown just attacked an officer and was fleeing into society (discounting robbery). This shooting was GOLD from jump.

Ugly? To be sure. Desired? Hell no. Justified? 100%.
You seem mixed up. The shooting was ugly, undesired, GOLD, and Wilson should have been a better shot and plugged the guy in the back?

You need to make up your mind, Zeke.

Last edited by donquixote99; 10-22-2014 at 06:19 PM.
Reply With Quote