Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke
That's bullshit, as is your constantly evolving (devolving?) story trying to victimize the allegedly criminal assailant. 
Do you remember when you were wailing about "thirty-five feet" and "shot in the back while fleeing?" I do.
In addition, the eyewitness testimony -- which I indicated from jump is typically woefully inaccurate -- that you've been using as the pillar for most of your apologism is being summarily negated as evidence is released.
1. The kid was a robber.
2. He felt entitled to his actions.
3. He didn't like being stopped.
4. He caused his own death.
That's what this distills to. |
You're way beyond the evidence here. Two and three are beyond any possible evidence. Technology to read the minds of dead people does not exist.
Number 2 is nothing but your own prejudice talking, in the complete and utter absence of data.
Number 4 is opinion that should await more information, and may be a question for a jury.