Quote:
Originally Posted by icenine
Depends on what is being balanced. One could say that Stanley Baldiwn and Neville Chamberlain were more balanced in their approach to the growing German threat in Europe during the 1930s while Churchill was more extreme in his lonely opposition. However we know what happened.
American are balanced about guns for the most part, despite all of the rhetoric. Yet we know the next massacre is just around the corner.
To me being balanced can mean not standing up for the right cause when necessary.
|
Chamberlain attitude was not a balanced one. It was extreme weakness.