Quote:
Originally Posted by bhunter
I'm about as anti-religious as they come; however, the narrow decision sought to resolve a fundamental conflict and did just that. The progressive caused problem can easily be remedied without walking on the religious liberty of the people, owners, of a closely held corporation. The assinine uproar by the left aptly demonstrates their utter lack of veracity wrt to the conflicting constitutional issue that their legislation caused. This case isn't the end of the world and is not a so-called attack on women's rights. The blatant misrepresentation of the decision is maliciously being used to gin up more division by what has now become the dividing party.
|
Perhaps, but my gut tells me that the Hobby Lobby CEO doesn't really care one way or the other whether one of his many employees uses IUD's or RU486 (he even has personal investments in the companies manufacturing the things he apparently is upset about). He's more interested in being a willing tool of the GOP and a participant in a their war-of-a-thousand-cuts against Obamacare.