View Single Post
  #16  
Old 06-30-2014, 11:10 AM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
I think he's suggesting the government can't spend someone's tax money of something that violates their religion. And whatever that implies.

It's very deep.
That is not what was said however. The statement itself merely suggests that the court now can rule that the government cannot spend taxpayer money.
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote