Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99
The quoted matter has in it's first sentence a definition of ethics, quite matter of fact. This is followed by three sentences that each assert exactly the same thing: ethics must be understood through an understanding of the nature of being. So, what he says three times must be true?
What this 'nature of being' might be I haven't the foggiest.
|
It is like Socrates asking the question what is justice?
forget it you will never hear the true meaning...
somewhere along the line the concept of forms will arise.