Quote:
Originally Posted by doucanoe
Oh ok. So it appears that they both do polls for hire, and what your are saying is that Rasmussen, is as credible as Research 2000 by default then.
I think I'm following now 
I believe that I could write my own Wikipedia entry could I not?
RC |
All pollsters do polling for hire. Sheesh! I'm not making any assertions about Research 2000 beyond the fact that, unlike Rasmussen, they don't have a reputation for biased polling.
You know, you're gonna believe what you want and, clearly, what you want to believe is that Scott Rasmussen is a non-partisan objective pollster when, in fact, he's a Republican consultant and operative who denies those associations even though they're a matter of public record.
As for Wikipedia, there was a citation for the information about Rasmussen's political consulting work. Here's the original.
http://projects.publicintegrity.org/...tail&id=122002
If you feel like it why not Google "Rasmussen Republican Bias" and see what you get. Do the same for Research 2000.
John