View Single Post
  #39  
Old 12-11-2009, 05:42 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete View Post
So you run a surplus, but go further in debt. You are absolutely right, I DON'T understand it. Hence shell game.

Pete
That chart isn't adjusted for inflation. When you do that here's what you get:

Inflation Adjusted Increase/Decrease In National Debt
1982-1985 Reagan +49.0%
1986-1989 Reagan +40.2%
1990-1993 Bush +32.7%
1994-1997 Clinton +13.2%
1998-2001 Clinton -0.2%
2002-2005 Bush +22.8%

The source for this didn't have Bush's second term.

This is interesting too:

1978-2005 Dem - Fed Spending +9.9%, Fed Debt +4.2%, GDP +12.6%
1978-2005 Rep - Fed Spending +12.1%, Fed Debt +36.4%, GDP +10.7%

So with Republican government since 1978 you get more spending, more debt and less growth.

Here's a graph I really like. :eek The upper block is debt in trillions of dollars. The lower block is debt as a percentage of GDP.

John
Attached Images
File Type: png 450px-US_Debt_Trend.svg.png (23.4 KB, 2 views)
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.

Last edited by Boreas; 12-11-2009 at 06:54 PM.
Reply With Quote