Redacted Truth
 

This largely jives with my take and lays out the arguments clearly:

"Note to GOP re. Benghazi: Stop calling it Watergate, Iran-contra, bigger than both, etc. First, it might well be, but we don’t know. History will judge. Second, overhyping will only diminish the importance of the scandal if it doesn’t meet presidency-breaking standards. Third, focusing on the political effects simply plays into the hands of Democrats desperately claiming that this is nothing but partisan politics.

Let the facts speak for themselves. They are damning enough. Let Gregory Hicks, the honorable, apolitical second-in-command that night in Libya, movingly and grippingly demolish the president’s Benghazi mantra that “what I have always tried to do is just get all the facts” and “every piece of information that we got, as we got it, we laid it out for the American people.”

On the contrary. Just hours into the Benghazi assault, Hicks reported, by phone to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton herself, on the attack with absolutely no mention of any demonstration or video, later to become the essence of the Susan Rice talking points that left him “stunned” and “embarrassed.”

......."

Whole column: http://gazettextra.com/news/2013/may...ctive-outrage/

Pete

So, a Krauthammer column in what's his face Lyin' Ryan's home town paper. Why am I not surprised? :p



Carl

In sum, it's propaganda.

Um, guys, it's the Krauts' weekly column - that paper was simply the first link I could find.

He works for the Washington Post.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...1f9_story.html

Pete

Uh-huh, yeah sure mac. Ryan fanboy's more like it. http://www.driveaccord.net/forums/im...ies/tongue.gif


Carl

:D

Pete

Pete is performing social welfare here bringing to our attention the truth about Benghazi. ;)
Let's give the man an exemption. :D

HAW!

Y'all are on fire today...Give it up, Pete. You're surrounded.

I have to drink the poison? :p

Pete

Sarah will rescue you Pete!






Carl :eek: