Political Forums

Political Forums (http://www.politicalchat.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.politicalchat.org/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Thou shalt not commit logical fallacies (http://www.politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=4444)

Rex E. 08-19-2012 10:41 AM

Thou shalt not commit logical fallacies
 
Pretty neat site that not only the politicians, but many or us on this site need to review

http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/home


:D

bobabode 08-19-2012 10:49 AM

:DWhere's the fun in that?;)

Boreas 08-19-2012 10:50 AM

Did you mean fallacies or phalluses? ;)

John

Rex E. 08-19-2012 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boreas (Post 117794)
Did you mean fallacies or phalluses? ;)

John

ooppssssssss.....fruedian for sure, eh....

Maybe D or Pete will fix that for me (or maybe not)

lol

no more posting before coffee for me


:D

Boreas 08-19-2012 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rex E. (Post 117795)
ooppssssssss.....fruedian for sure, eh....

Maybe D or Pete will fix that for me (or maybe not)

lol

no more posting before coffee for me


:D

That's a pretty cool site. I think it should be required reading for our Right Wing friends. (Of course, those of us on the Left are never guilty of such lapses but it's fun to see the entire universe of Right Wing debate tactics so ably lampooned.)

John

finnbow 08-19-2012 12:53 PM

Could you imagine if a law were passed prohibiting logical fallacies during political campaigns or while debating public policy? Politicians wouldn't know whether to sh!t or go blind.

ebacon 08-19-2012 02:03 PM

There is some commentary to the effect that debates provided a lot more information during our earliest days because our only politicians were our best ones. IMO there is a lot of truth to that. For example reading The Federalist Papers sure provides a different perspective of our earliest days than reading modern recollections.

Speaking of which, there a few modern Federalist Papers floating around. They are claimed to be easier to read versions of the originals and some might be. For sure there are others that while being called Federalist Papers they actually lay out modern plans for the Federal government.

Be careful with that stuff if you are into it.

finnbow 08-19-2012 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebacon (Post 117817)
There is some commentary to the effect that debates provided a lot more information during our earliest days because our only politicians were our best ones....

A visit to the Lincoln or Jefferson memorials in DC confirms the intellect of our earlier leaders. I've been to both dozens of times and am still in awe after reading their writings engraved on the walls.

bhunter 08-19-2012 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rex E. (Post 117791)
Pretty neat site that not only the politicians, but many or us on this site need to review

http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/home


:D

Great Site!

Here's another for perusal along with the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...dex.html#index

http://plato.stanford.edu/contents.html

Twodogs 08-19-2012 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebacon (Post 117817)
There is some commentary to the effect that debates provided a lot more information during our earliest days because our only politicians were our best ones. IMO there is a lot of truth to that. For example reading The Federalist Papers sure provides a different perspective of our earliest days than reading modern recollections.

Speaking of which, there a few modern Federalist Papers floating around. They are claimed to be easier to read versions of the originals and some might be. For sure there are others that while being called Federalist Papers they actually lay out modern plans for the Federal government.

Be careful with that stuff if you are into it.

I went to a two week group reading and study of those papers about a month ago. Very interesting stuff, and I prefer the originals.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.