Political Forums

Political Forums (http://www.politicalchat.org/index.php)
-   Current events (http://www.politicalchat.org/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Are we losing in Afghanistan? (http://www.politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=3414)

Dondilion 12-27-2011 04:58 PM

Are we losing in Afghanistan?
 
In Afghanistan IEDs have so demoralised the Brits and American troops that there is tremendous fear of putting boots on the ground. Every time the coalition comes up with an high tech solution for the IEDs the taliban finds a low tech way around it.

Now there is a concerted high tech effort to go after the network of people who finance and support the IEDS. I hope this makes an effective difference.

http://journey-world.com/2011/12/attacking-the-network/

BlueStreak 12-27-2011 05:04 PM

Probably.

Dave

Bigerik 12-27-2011 05:22 PM

Losing? We lost it ages ago. We gave most of the country to drug dealers (Northern Alliance) and their sponsors (former soviet union -yes, we gave them what they couldn't get on their own). We have a fraction of the troops we need in the ground to do the job, and then we blame Pakistan for the problems.

There should have never been a "war" in afghanistan. It should have been a monster special forces attack right around September 12 or 13th. And then brought the boys back home again.

Removing the Taliban from power is nothing like winning the war. Bush's boneheads couldn't figure that out tho.

epifanatic 12-27-2011 05:50 PM

Were we ever winning?

Dondilion 12-27-2011 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigerik (Post 83828)
Losing? We lost it ages ago. We gave most of the country to drug dealers (Northern Alliance) and their sponsors (former soviet union -yes, we gave them what they couldn't get on their own). We have a fraction of the troops we need in the ground to do the job, and then we blame Pakistan for the problems.

There should have never been a "war" in afghanistan. It should have been a monster special forces attack right around September 12 or 13th. And then brought the boys back home again.

Removing the Taliban from power is nothing like winning the war. Bush's boneheads couldn't figure that out tho.

But wasn't it Obama who escalate? Or surge?

BlueStreak 12-27-2011 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dondilion (Post 83830)
But wasn't it Obama who escalate? Or surge?

He did, didn't he? So did Bush. Come to think of it, I have escalated and surged a few times myself. It's usually followed by a long nap.

Makes no difference, dousing a raging forestfire with a shot glass is an exercise in futility anyways. Whether you do it alone or have a hundred people helping.

Dave

piece-itpete 12-28-2011 09:24 AM

O ye of little faith.

:)

I'm certain the surge was planned all along. So Obama is once again continuing Bush's failed policies. Yes we can believe in change :p

Hitting the Taliban and walking away would've been as successful as Clinton lobbing a few cruise missiles at training camps.

Pete

Oerets 12-28-2011 11:18 AM

We could leave today or ten years from now and I afraid the same thing will happen once we are gone. A civil war between the large cities and the rural areas. Pashtuns, and the Tajiks to name a few of the close to twenty ethnic groups have a long history of not playing nicely.
Then add outside countries influencing events it is a mess that will keep giving up surprises.




Barney

Charles 12-28-2011 04:36 PM

Define winning.

Chas

finnbow 12-28-2011 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charles (Post 83852)
Define winning.

Chas

Not losing???


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.